Local blogosphere abuzz lately with talk about the Congressional vote on the Employee Free Choice bill. Randy Kuhl's vote, specifically, has received plenty of attention. He voted no despite originally co-sponsoring the bill. If we are scoring correctly Rochester Turning says that's bad and the Fighting 29th (a Colbert voice always says this blog title in my head) says it's not such a big deal.
The Fighting 29th examines the benefits of unionization in a post today. The WBP decided to take a look as well.
According to a January 25th, 2007 US Department of Labor report:
In 2006, full-time wage and salary workers who were union members had median usual weekly earnings of $833, compared with a median of $642 for wage and salary workers who were not represented by unions.
In plain numbers, being a member of a union will earn you more money. Numbers can be misleading, though, and perhaps the trend is more closely linked to what industries see widest union membership, rather than membership itself:
Workers in the public sector had a union membership rate nearly five times that of private sector employees . . . The union membership rate for government workers (36.2 percent) was substantially higher than for private industry workers (7.4 percent). Within the public sector, local government workers had the highest union membership rate, 41.9 percent. This group includes several heavily unionized occupations, such as teachers, police officers, and fire fighters. Among major private industries, transportation and utilities had the highest union membership rate, at 23.2 percent, followed by construction (13.0 percent) . . . Among occupational groups, education, training, and library occupations (37.3 percent) and protective service occupations (34.7 percent) had the highest unionization rates
At the least this data tells us how the legislation was pushed through as these sectors are represented by very powerful lobbies, but does it tell us why? The majority of "average American workers" who belong to unions are not benefiting from union membership because "average Americans" are not public sector employees.
What if the focus is pared down to state level? Not many would say that the Upstate New York economy is booming. Does union membership play a role?
Four states had union membership rates over 20.0 percent in 2006--Hawaii (24.7 percent), New York (24.4 percent), Alaska (22.2 percent), and New Jersey (20.1 percent). Hawaii and New York have recorded the highest union membership rates among all states for 10 of the past 11 years.
Alaska and Hawaii can essentially be thrown out since their economies are anomalies given geography; left are New York and New Jersey, economies on the grow or on the decline?
The southern United States, particularly the southeast, have experienced considerable economic growth over the past decade. How do unions factor?
Among the five states reporting union membership rates below 5.0 percent in 2006, North Carolina and South Carolina continued to post the lowest rates (3.3 percent each). The next lowest rates were recorded in Virginia (4.0 percent), Georgia (4.4 percent), and Texas (4.9 percent).
Union membership across the country is declining, but unions are big money and this legislation is a response to those declining numbers. The law may benefit the membership rolls but I have trouble believing it will benefit our economy.



